For Sure! I think your urologist might offer a similar "solution" ... I didn't mention it above but the Phimosis with DH isn't exactly gone from having the frenectomy ... to me it just allows for better cleaning with the option to retract the foreskin during sex, but the issue is it doesn't stay retracted.... so basically in that "final moment" when DH is going to ejaculate we have to make sure the foreskin is pulled back so that nothing is getting trapped... ie the prime swimmers, but I'm not sure this is effective. Precum has a lot of prime swimmers too so we are only addressing 50% of the problem, where 100% of the problem would have been solved with a circumcision. I just feel like the urologist sided with hubby because hubby didn't like the idea of surgery down there... but its just a circumcision afterall. So now this is like 8 months later, and still trying, and now our doctor thinks the phimosis may have reduced the "ducting" ie urethra... which limits the volume ... and recommends that we hold the foreskin back as far as possible at the final moment.... well this is impossible without "it" slipping out. Honestly if we could go back from what we have done in the last 8 months, I would have just made sure DH was getting circumcised, because all of this non sense with the foreskin makes no sense. I have no prior experience with foreskin, and I can tell you I have no use for it either. Circumcised is all I have ever known. I also haven't seen many posts about phimosis or any articles but our doctor told us that when its male factor its her first consideration, along with urethral strictures... which there is also not much info on.
Good luck I'm interested to hear what solution is recommended.